Saturday, 16 June 2012

Tips for Building a PC: Part 3-CPUs




Choosing a CPU is not as difficult as it used to be especially at the high end of the market. There are two manufactures of CPUs, Intel and AMD. However, recently AMD has fallen behind Intel in terms of performance and power consumption. This has meant that there is no AMD made CPU that can compete with Intel’s offerings at the mid-range and the enthusiast level. Therefore in this guide we will make suggestions for both AMD and Intel CPUs at the budget price range but once you start spending £140 and over you should really be looking for the performance that Intel CPUs can offer.

CPUs

Before stating our recommendations there are a few things to know about CPUs. The first thing is that the CPU is like the brain of the computer. It is one of the most important parts of the PC and the better the CPU the faster the computer will carry out tasks from gaming to web browsing. CPUs also come with different numbers of cores and threads. The standard core counts of the current generation of processors are dual cores (two cores) and quad cores (four cores). However, while Intel have both dual core and quad core processors AMD has muddied the water in recent times by unveiling a CPU that has eight cores. While this may seem impressive, AMD has changed its definition of what a core is and therefore performance is still not as good as Intel's four core processors. The impact of more cores is still somewhat limited in many applications although some games as well as video rendering programs certainly benefit from having more cores. Thus when looking at processors do not be fooled into thinking that more cores are always better, although with Intel that is often the case. Finally some processors can be overclocked, while others can't. Overclocking is a means of running your CPUs faster in order to gain more performance out of it. Unfortunately overclocking does carry it risks and also requires an aftermarket cooler. Intel's marks its CPUs with a “k” at the end if they can be overclocked whereas all of AMDs FX processors can be overclocked.


Budget: Intel Core i3 2100/ AMD fx 4100:

Selecting a budget CPU like any other component decision, although the point is especially pertinent here, is about the price to performance ratio. The core i3 2100 is excellent CPU for £90. It is a dual core processor and runs at 3.1Ghz. Unfortunately unlike Intel's “k” processors this CPU is unable to be overclocked. Apart from that though there is very little to dislike about core i3 2100. Indeed as a Tom's Hardware article showed it is a better gaming CPU than the FX 4100, although due to it only having two cores it will not be able to match the video rendering and multi core optimised program performance of the AMD FX 4100. However, it must also be noted that on 24th June Intel is set to release its Ivy Bridge core i3 processors. So if you are looking at the budget end of the market then it is probably worth waiting to see what Intel unveils in a weeks time.

The AMD fx 4100 is a quad core processor that runs at 3.6Ghz and for £80 is certainly excellent value. As previously stated it is not quite a match for the core i3 2100 in the gaming stakes although it is overclockable which is a nice feature for those of you hoping to get the most out of your CPU. Secondly being an AM3+ socket CPU, motherboards for this processor are slightly cheaper than for the Intel core i3 2100. Therefore while the processor is only £10 cheaper you may be able to save around £30-£40 overall when you factor in the cost of the motherboard (see part 4). Overall there really isn’t too much difference between the two CPUs. If you want a good gaming processor that will carry out most of the tasks you want then go with the i3 2100. If on the other hand you want to be able to overclock your processor and the more cores are of value to you then the AMD FX 4100 will adequately serve your needs.



Mid-Range : i5 3570k

There is only one option when choosing a mid-range CPU. The £170 Intel core i5 3570k is a quad core Ivy Bridge CPU that is perfect for gaming as well as offering the best performance per core ratio of any Intel CPU. Being a “k” processor the i5 3570k is capable of being overclocked, although if you are going to overclock you really should buy an aftermarket cooler. Intel's Ivy bridge processors also have support for PCI express 3.0, which means if you have a compatible motherboard and are running two or more graphics cards you are unlikely to see performance decreasing due to the bandwidth available to each card. Being one of Intel’s brand new Ivy Bridge CPUs the 3570k also has around 15% better performance than the previous generation as well as using up less power with a TPD of 77w. Running at 3.6Ghz there is little that the 3570k can’t do and while it isn’t quite the best CPU for video editing, for the price it really is unbeatable. Finally it is also nice to see that Intel has kept to the same LGA 1155 socket as the previous generation of processors so if you want you can use your sandy bridge motherboard if you have one. Overall there isn’t much to say about the i5 3570k apart from that if you are looking for a mid-range or gaming CPU the 3570k is a must buy.



Enthusiast: i7 3770k
Like the i5 3570k, the i7 3770k is the only CPU that can be recommended for an enthusiast build. Unless of course you want to spend £1000 instead of the the £260 that the 3770k will set you back. Like the i5 3570k the i7 3770k is a quad core CPU, although it also comes with eight threads which means that it can carry out processes that benefit from having more cores more quickly. This isn't really a benefit to gamers but for those of you who use photoshop regularly as well as edit videos it is certainly going to help to speed up the rendering process. The i7 3770k being a “k” processor is also overclockable if the base clock of 3.5Ghz isn't enough for you already. Indeed the i7 3770k is Intel's top Ivy Bridge processor and while performance is excellent if you don't need the hyperthreading that the 3770k comes with that its probably best to buy the i5 3570k.


Friday, 15 June 2012

Day in Tech: 15th June 2012




Google's ChromeBooks continue to struggle with less 0.2% of desktop traffic reported to come through Chrome OS




Intel announces its low cost, low end core i3 Ivy Bridge chips will launch on June 24th




Apple and Samsung accounted for 90% of the smartphone profits in the first quarter of 2012




Tesco buys music streaming service We7 for a cool £10.8million



In other news...

Indonesian man sentenced to thirty months is prison for atheist Facebook comments


Day in Tech: 14th June 2012




Samsung denies rumours it is making a Facebook competitor




Nokia announces plans to axe 10,000 jobs and lowers financial forecasts





Details on Dell's Windows 8 tablet leaked





In other news...

Vodafone unveils umbrella that boosts your mobile signal and charges your phone




Australian website Kogan.com introduce world's first browser tax for internet explorer 7


Thursday, 14 June 2012

Windows 8 and a Form Factor Nobody Wants



It is clear from the Windows 8 release preview that Microsoft is heavily pushing its Metro UI in the hope that it will be able to merge its mobile and desktop operating systems together. Indeed after Computex last week it would seem that this decision has caused manufacturers to create a new form factor, the touchscreen notebook and in extreme cases, such as the ASUS Taichi, a notebook that has dual displays, one to be used as a tablet screen on the outside and another to be used as a traditional laptop display would be. The question that comes to mind when viewing these devices though is whether manufacturers feel as though they are being forced into making touchscreen laptops because this is how best to interact with Windows 8 and if so, will this pose problems for both Microsoft and PC manufacturers.



The introduction of Metro UI

Windows 8 and Microsoft's move towards Metro UI is the biggest departure Microsoft has made from the traditional desktop OS in many years. Not only has it ditched the ubiquitous start button but by introducing the Metro UI previously seen on Windows Phone 7 it is hoping that it will be able to merge its desktop, tablet and mobile operating systems together. By doing this, Microsoft believes that it will not only provide a more unified user experience but also encourage developers to create apps that have huge appeal to the millions of people that use Windows across all devices. However, it risks alienating its desktop users and more worryingly also its enterprise customers. While it is impossible to make a judgement on an unfinished product, it is likely that business users would have preferred an evolution on Windows 7 as opposed to the revolution of Windows 8. Although there will be a desktop view similar to Windows 7 they will have to cope without a start button and in Windows 8 some things can only be carried out in the Metro UI. It seems that Microsoft is concentrating on its home users and the idea that this tile based UI will help freshen up Windows and show people that Microsoft not only cares about the desktop but also the tablet and mobile markets as well. Whether or not this has forced manufacturers to produce devices that supposedly play to Windows 8’s strengths is another matter entirely.




 A Form Factor Nobody Wants?

Indeed the decision to produce laptops with touchscreens looks questionable. There is no evidence to suggest that what consumers want are laptops that also have touchscreens. Indeed for many people the two notions should be separate. We enjoy using touchscreens on phones and tablets because they are a convenient way to browse the internet and respond to emails without having the added bulk and size that having a keyboard brings. However, when using a laptop we often do so because we want the keyboard as it increases our productivity compared to a touchscreen. Therefore a laptop with a touchscreen actually seems to offer up functionality that people do not want. Tablets normally come in a slate form factor because that is the easiest way to use them. Having a touchscreen on a laptop is inconvenient due to the angle of the screen which is likely to lead to an uncomfortable experience during long periods of use. Even more worryingly for manufacturers is that having a touchscreen on a laptop will likely increase the price of the device. A touchscreen might be something that consumers do not mind having if they do not have to pay any extra for it but it is unlikely that they would pay for something that is likely to be unwieldy and less convenient than a tablet would be.


Furthermore manufacturers do not seem to know what market they are producing the device for. The ZenBook Prime ultrabook by Asus is looking like the ultrabook to beat when it is released later this year. At Computex Asus announced that both 11” and 13” variants of the device would also be available with touchscreens. However, someone buying this device is unlikely to want to pay extra for the touchscreen. The Prime is a high end device that will likely cost around $800-1000 yet people who buy this sort of device are not the sort to also want a laptop with a touchscreen. For example many people who have bought tablets have done so because they realised that previously they only used their computers to browse the internet and respond to emails. Therefore a tablet is both cheaper than a laptop and also offers up more portability. On the other hand a person who spends $1000 dollars on a laptop does so because they don't want the limited functionality of a touchscreen and instead wants the power and productivity of a laptop. By adding a touchscreen to a device aimed at this sort of consumer you are not adding any sort of value to the product as you are targeting an audience that has deliberately chosen a powerful laptop over a touchscreen as it provides more value to them. This leads us to wonder whether the manufacturers realise this or instead feel the need to build laptops with touchscreens because that is the easiest way to use Windows 8.



An OS Reliant on Touchscreens and Multitouch Trackpads?

Reports have suggested that Metro UI works extremely well with touchscreens and quite well with trackpad gestures. Indeed as a tablet experience Windows 8 looks like it could offer up a serious challenge to Android and iOS. However, by incorporating a tablet interface into the desktop OS Microsoft has forced manufacturers into producing devices that have touchscreens as this is the best way of navigating the OS. Manufacturers either have to add a touchscreen to their device or improve upon their trackpads and driver support. It is likely that a manufacturer would see a touchscreen as a much more appealing feature to a customer than updated multitouch trackpads would be. Thus they have opted for the touchscreen as Windows 8 is best used with either a touchscreen or multitouch trackpad and only one of those options is a clear selling point. If this is the case then it could lead to serious problems for both Microsoft and PC manufacturers. As stated previously people will not want to pay more for a touchscreen if they are already spending a considerable amount of money on the laptop in the first place. These customers will expect to be able to use their PC as they want without the need to buy a touchscreen version. Indeed it may lead these people to reject Microsoft’s new OS if they are unable to navigate it quickly and efficiently, something they have previously been able to do on a traditional laptop.



Failure is Not an Option

It would therefore seem that Microsoft’s gamble has also become a gamble for manufacturers as well. They may see Windows 8 as an opportunity to sell new hardware and promote a new form factor. Unfortunately this looks like a form factor that nobody wants. People looking for a tablet experience will stick to the iPad or even specific Windows 8 tablets. Those people wanting a tablet with the ability to occasionally use it to write longer emails of word documents are likely to be drawn to the Asus Transformer Book. A Windows 8 tablet that also has a keyboard dock much like the Transformer Prime. Finally there are the people who just want a laptop as their sole computing device. They do not want to pay extra for a touchscreen as they would prefer to use a mouse and keyboard. This leaves that touchscreen laptop in an awkward position in the market and could end up with both the failure of these form factors and more worryingly the failure or windows 8. If such a device is needed to use Windows 8 properly then Microsoft has fundamentally failed to successfully revolutionise its operating system. Indeed if it fails it won’t be the only company hit.


Sources

Monday, 11 June 2012

Day in Tech: 11th June 2012




Apple announces iOS 6 and OSX Mountain Lion, to be released with the new iPhone and in July respectively.





MacBook Pro and Air get updated with Ivy Bridge and USB 3.0




Redesigned MacBook Pro comes with Retina Display (2880x1800)




Lenovo unveils ability to order internet for its thinkpads through itself instead of telecoms networks




In other news...

Microsoft have had to apologise over bizarre,hilarious and rather un-pc song played about being a software developer at its PR event in Norway


http://www.kitguru.net/channel/lopan/microsofts-flaccid-pr-gaff/